Publications

The surgeons of Boulder Neurosurgical & Spine Associates (BNA) founded the Justin Parker Neurological Institute (JPNI) for the purpose of conducting clinical research, as well as to advance knowledge for medical providers, and to practice medicine through innovations in clinical technology. The mission of JPNI is to advance scientific discoveries and innovative medical technologies into clinical practice by conducting clinical trials in order to implement best practices and disseminate that knowledge to the medical community. JPNI conducts investigator-initiated research and is often the practice of choice for multiple FDA-controlled clinical research trials. Our physicians have collectively published their research in hundreds of peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international meetings.

The value in being a research-driven organization is that we practice evidence-based medicine and our patients are afforded with access to the most advanced technologies that may not otherwise be available for clinical use at the time. BNA patients are offered to participate in studies evaluating the newest devices and treatment methods, including stem cell therapy, laser-assisted minimally invasive spine surgeries, dynamic motion stabilization systems, cervical and lumbar artificial discs.

Following is a list of published clinical research conducted by BNA physicians:

The Duration of Symptoms and Clinical Outcomes in Patients undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease and Radiculopathy
Sigita Burneikiene, MD, E. Lee Nelson, MD, Alexander Mason, MD, Sharad Rajpal, MD, Alan T. Villavicencio, MD: Spine Journal 15 (2015).

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery is quite effective in relieving radiculopathy symptoms in patients suffering from symptomatic cervical spondylosis. However, the optimal timing for surgical treatment
has not been clearly defined. Insurance companies require at least a 6-week trial of conservative treatment before approving this procedure. The systematic reviews that analyzed if timing of surgery had any effect on clinical outcomes found insufficient evidence to make any recommendations.

On the contrary, the vast majority of reports published in the literature on the duration of symptoms (DOS) and clinical outcome correlation in patients undergoing lumbar surgeries for painful degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy agree that shorter DOS before surgery resulted in improved clinical outcomes. The primary purpose of this study was to analyze if the DOS has any effect on clinical outcomes and resolution of radicular symptoms in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy because of degenerative
disc disease.

pdf_icon

The Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative Image Guidance Systems
Alexander Mason, MD, Renee Paulsen, PhD, Jason M. Babuska, BA, Sharad Rajpal, MD, Sigita Burneikiene, MD, Lee Nelson, MD, and Alan T. Villavicencio, MD. J Neurosurg: Spine, Volume 20, February 2014.

Several retrospective studies have demonstrated higher accuracy rates and increased safety for navigated pedicle screw placement than for free-hand techniques; however, the accuracy differences between navigation systems has not been extensively studied. In some instances, 3D fluoroscopic navigation methods have been reported to not be more accurate than 2D navigation methods for pedicle screw placement. The authors of this study endeavored to identify if 3D fluoroscopic navigation methods resulted in a higher placement accuracy of pedicle screws.

pdf_icon

Preliminary Results on Feasibility of Outpatient Instrumented Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Alan T. Villavicencio, MD, Lee Nelson, MD, Alexander Mason, MD, Sharad Rajpal, MD, and Sigita Burneikiene, MD. J Spinal Disord Tech  Volume 26, Number 6, August 2013.

The primary objective of this study was to analyze our preliminary results to examine whether it is safe and effective to perform instrumented lumbar interbody fusions on an outpatient basis by comparing 2 groups of patients who were discharged the same day versus those who stayed overnight. The secondary objective was to identify the need for prolonged observation for complications that may occur in the immediate postoperative period.

pdf_icon

Complications in patients undergoing combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation with deformity correction for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis
Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Mason A, Rajpal S, Serxner B, Villavicencio AT. Surgical Neurology International. Vol. 3 (1): Jan-Feb 2012.

Utilization of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) approach for scoliosis offers the patients deformity correction and interbody fusion without the additional morbidity associated with more invasive reconstructive techniques. The purpose of this study was to quantify the intra- and postoperative complications associated with the TLIF surgical approach in patients undergoing surgery for spinal stenosis and degenerative scoliosis correction.

pdf_icon

Surgical treatment strategies for the previously operated lumbar spine
Villavicencio AT, Nelson EL, Burneikiene S, Arends G. Contemporary Spine Surgery. Vol. 13 (1): January 2012.

This review focuses on some contemporary surgical treatment strategies for the previously operated lumbar spine. Patients who fail to improve after spine surgery or those who develop new symptoms after initially “successful” surgery are commonly labeled with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Multiple factors may be responsible for this complex syndrome, and various therapeutic approaches should be employed for structural anatomic and nonstructural problems in the previously operated spine. Any surgical intervention should be considered with a specific etiologic cause in mind. Newer technologies in spine surgery are discussed with an emphasis on technical difficulties involved in the revision surgery.

pdf_icon

Effect on clinical outcomes of patient pain expectancies and preoperative Mental Component Summary scores from the 36-item Short Form Health Survey following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Carr F, Healey K, Villavicencio AT, Nelson EL, Mason A, Burneikiene S, Hernandez T. J Neurosurg Spine. Vol. 15: November 2011

The primary purpose of this study was to analyze what effect preoperative patient expectations and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores have on clinical outcomes.

pdf_icon

Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment
Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Busch E, Roeca C, Nelson EL, Mason A, Burneikiene S. Neurosurgery. Vol. 68 (5): May 2011.

Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine has received increased attention in the literature as an important determinant of clinical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Surgeons use parallel or lordotically fashioned grafts depending on preference or simple availability. The objective of this study was to quantitatively assess and compare cervical sagittal alignment and clinical outcome when lordotic or parallel allografts were used for fusion.

pdf_icon

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca C, Nelson EL, Mason A. Surgical Neurology International. Vol. 1 (1): Jan-Mar 2010.

The purpose of this study was to directly compare safety and effectiveness for minimally invasive (MI) and open approaches for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

pdf_icon

Current status of clinical evidence and indications for cervical arthroplasty
Villavicencio AT, Hernandez T, Hughes BD, Healey K, Burneikiene S. Contemporary Neurosurgery. Vol. 32 (2): February 1, 2010.

It has been predicted that cervical arthroplasty will replace fusion and become the new “gold standard” in the near future. Although short-term clinical results associated with cervical artificial disc replacement are promising, long-term benefits of reduced stress on the adjacent levels or effectiveness of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remain unknown. The advantage of preserved segmental mobility should be weighed against potential negative effects on the facet joints and the possibility of late implant failure or loosening. Strict patient selection based on clear indications and absence of exclusion criteria should heavily outweigh the marketing enthusiasm.

pdf_icon

CyberKnife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia treatment: A preliminary multicenter experience
Villavicencio AT, Lim M, Burneikiene S, Romanelli P, Adler JR, McNeeley L, Chang SD, Fariselli L, McIntyre M, Bower R, Broggi G, Thramann JJ. Neurosurgery. Vol. 62 (3): March 2008.

Radiosurgery has gained acceptance as a treatment option for trigeminal neuralgia. Our preliminary multicenter experience treating trigeminal neuralgia with the CyberKnife was reported.

pdf_icon

Neck pain in multisport athletes
Villavicencio AT, Hernandez D, Burneikiene S, Thramann J. J Neurosurg Spine. Vol. 7: October 2007.

The sport of triathlon is very physically demanding and has experienced rapid growth in recent years. The number of triathletes seen for spine disorders at neurosurgery clinics is increasing. Neck pain and overuse injuries have not been adequately studied in multisport athletes. The authors undertook an epidemiological study to establish the lifetime incidence of neck pain and the prevalence of possible discogenic pain, and to identify risk factors among triathletes in the Boulder, Colorado area.

pdf_icon

Spinal artificial disc replacement: Cervical arthroplasty part I: History, design, and types of artificial discs
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Pashman R, Johnson JP. Contemporary Neurosurgery. Vol. 29 (12): June 15, 2007.

Cervical arthroplasty is a rapidly developing surgical treatment option for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. This article reviews design features of the cervical devices currently being evaluated in FDA-controlled Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) prospective randomized clinical trials. Neural decompression and arthrodesis have been the mainstays of treatment for many cervical spinal conditions for more than 50 years. Artificial disc replacement surgery allows for effective decompression without sacrificing segmental motion, theoretically preserving the patient’s functional capacity. The importance of preservation of the spinal motion segment and restoration of normal physiologic biomechanics of the cervical spine is becoming increasingly recognized. Arthrodesis alters the biomechanics of the spine, possibly leading to further degeneration at adjacent levels. Early clinical studies have shown promise, but whether arthroplasty is capable of reducing adjacent level degeneration has not yet been proved in long-term prospective clinical trials.

pdf_icon

Artificial disc replacement: Cervical arthroplasty, part II: Indications, surgical technique, and complications
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Pashman R, Johnson JP. Contemporary Neurosurgery. Vol. 29 (13): June 30, 2007.

Cervical arthroplasty is a rapidly advancing surgical treatment option for cervical spine degenerative disc disease. Although early clinical studies have shown promise, long-term prospective clinical trials are needed to prove whether arthroplasty is capable of reducing adjacent level degeneration, preserving motion and normal biomechanics of the spine, or achieving effective clinical outcomes. This article reviews indications, surgical technique, available preliminary clinical outcomes, and complications for cervical devices currently being evaluated in FDA-controlled Investigational Device Exemption prospective randomized clinical trials.

pdf_icon

The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
Villavicencio AT, Pushchak E, Burneikiene S, Thramann J. The Spine Journal 7 (2007) 148-153.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing single, two- and three-level ACDF with instrumentation on an outpatient or 23-hour observation period basis without compromising the purported benefits of surgery.

pdf_icon

Back and neck pain in triathletes
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Hernandez T, Thramann J. Neurosurg Focus. Vol. 21: October 2006.

As the sport of triathlon has continued to grow, increasing numbers of triathletes have presented in the neurosurgery clinics with various spinal disorders. This epidemiological study was undertaken to establish the lifetime incidence of neck and back pain, to gauge the prevalence of discogenic pain, and to identify risk factors among triathletes in the Boulder, Colorado, area.

pdf_icon

Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior–posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann J. Spinal Disord Tech. Vol. 19 (2): April 2006.

Multiple different approaches are used to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease and spinal instability. Both anterior–posterior (AP) reconstructive surgery and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) provide a circumferential fusion and are considered reasonable surgical options. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess clinical parameters such as surgical blood loss, duration of the procedure, length of hospitalization, and complications for TLIF and AP reconstructive surgery for lumbar fusion.

pdf_icon

Elements of the pre-operative workup, case examples
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S. Pain Medicine. Vol. 7 (S1): 2006.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-recognized method of treating a variety of chronic neuropathic conditions that are refractory to conservative management. One of the most challenging aspects of this technique is proper patient selection. In this study we reviewed available knowledge, differential diagnosis, and strategies utilized for the management of patients who were considered for a neurostimulation procedure. Clinical and neurological evaluation, complete diagnostic workup, a behavioral assessment, and a screening trial are all essential to determine a patient’s suitability for SCS implantation. A correct diagnosis and proper indications will help to achieve optimal treatment results and improve quality of life for a considerable number of patients suffering from intractable pain.

pdf_icon

Safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and intervertebral recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Nelson EL, Bulsara KR, Favors M, Thramann J. J Neurosurg Spine. Vol. 3: December 2005.

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein–2 (rhBMP-2) is being increasingly used for spinal fusion. This study analyzed its clinical safety, effectiveness, and clinical outcome when applied on an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) in conjunction with allograft for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

pdf_icon

Spinal artificial disc replacement: Lumbar arthroplasty Part I
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Johnson JP. Contemporary Neurosurgery. Vol. 27 (18): September 15, 2005.

Artificial disc technology is designed to replace degenerated or injured discs with a prosthesis that allows for normal physiologic movement of the spine. Artificial discs offer an alternative to arthrodesis, and arthroplasty is expected to replace up to 25% of fusion surgeries in the future.

pdf_icon

Spinal artificial disc replacement: Lumbar arthroplasty, Part II
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Johnson JP. Contemporary Neurosurgery. Vol. 27 (19): September 30, 2005.

Indications for artificial disc replacement (ADR) are still being developed for each of the different devices. The ideal candidate for artificial disc replacement surgery has low back pain of discogenic origin with no significant facet joint changes, no previous fusion surgeries or other operations involving the facet joints at the level in question, no canal stenosis, and no more than 3 mm of spondylolisthesis. The patient should have received at least 6 months of conservative treatment with unsuccessful results.

pdf_icon

Utility of computerized isocentric fluoroscopy for minimally invasive spinal surgical techniques
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ. Spinal Disord Tech. Vol. 18 (4): August 2005.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the clinical utility and accuracy of intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy as an adjunct for the placement of a complex spinal instrumentation.

pdf_icon

CyberKnife radiosurgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia
Lim M, Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Chang SD, Romanelli P, McNeeley L, McIntyre M, Thramann JJ, Adler JR. Neurosurg Focus. Vol. 18: April 2005.

The safety and efficacy of CyberKnife radiosurgery as a treatment option for TN is analyzed.

pdf_icon

Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computerized tomography guidance for percutaneous kyphoplasty
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ. Neurosurg Focus. Vol. 18: March 2005.

Percutaneous kyphoplasty is an established method for the treatment of pathological vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). This procedure is usually performed with the aid of biplanar fluoroscopic image guidance. There are currently no published clinical studies in which the use of three-dimensional (3D) image guidance to facilitate this technique has been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of isocentric fluoroscopy-based navigation for the kyphoplasty procedure, with special reference to operating time and the amount of radiation exposure.

pdf_icon